Endmyopia:Optometry degrees optional - Revision history

NottNott at 12:08, 13 June 2020

2020-06-13T12:08:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:08, 13 June 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~EMguideline~~\|EM:OVERLYTECHNICAL\|EM:ODO}}		{{EM guideline\|EM:OVERLYTECHNICAL\|EM:ODO}}
	The technical, heavy sciency content should be independent from, practical ‘tha steps’, or ‘how to reduce’ articles.		The technical, heavy sciency content should be independent from, practical ‘tha steps’, or ‘how to reduce’ articles.

NottNott: Text replacement - "{{P?olicies and g?uidelines}}" to "{{Editing navbox}}"

2020-06-12T12:22:44Z

Text replacement - "{{P?olicies and g?uidelines}}" to "{{Editing navbox}}"

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:22, 12 June 2020
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Normal people couldn't care less about your P values and correlation coefficients. :)		Normal people couldn't care less about your P values and correlation coefficients. :)

	{{~~Policies and guidelines~~}}		{{Editing navbox}}

Viceroy Sam: {{Policies and guidelines}}

2020-05-28T12:26:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:26, 28 May 2020
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Normal people couldn't care less about your P values and correlation coefficients. :)		Normal people couldn't care less about your P values and correlation coefficients. :)

			{{Policies and guidelines}}

NottNott at 12:13, 27 May 2020

2020-05-27T12:13:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:13, 27 May 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~Eyegurudecree~~\|EM:OVERLYTECHNICAL\|EM:ODO}}		{{EMguideline\|EM:OVERLYTECHNICAL\|EM:ODO}}
	The technical, heavy sciency content should be independent from, practical ‘tha steps’, or ‘how to reduce’ articles.		The technical, heavy sciency content should be independent from, practical ‘tha steps’, or ‘how to reduce’ articles.

NottNott at 19:47, 23 May 2020

2020-05-23T19:47:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:47, 23 May 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Eyegurudecree\|EM:OVERLYTECHNICAL\|EM:ODO}}
	The technical, heavy sciency content should be independent from, practical ‘tha steps’, or ‘how to reduce’ articles.		The technical, heavy sciency content should be independent from, practical ‘tha steps’, or ‘how to reduce’ articles.

NottNott: Created page with "The technical, heavy sciency content should be independent from, practical ‘tha steps’, or ‘how to reduce’ articles. Citations from clinical studies heavily encourag..."

2020-05-18T11:37:03Z

Created page with "The technical, heavy sciency content should be independent from, practical ‘tha steps’, or ‘how to reduce’ articles. Citations from clinical studies heavily encourag..."

New page

The technical, heavy sciency content should be independent from, practical ‘tha steps’, or ‘how to reduce’ articles.

Citations from clinical studies heavily encouraged all over the wiki (just like how Wikipedia does it).

There should not be a heavy and detailed discussion of the mechanism of axial change with diagrams in the middle of the ‘Where to start’ article (brief mention fine).

Normal people couldn't care less about your P values and correlation coefficients. :)