User:User - Revision history

User: Replaced content with "For no reason, my forum account was banned right after it was created. After it was sorted out, my account on that forum is https://community.endmyopia.org/u/a-user"

2022-01-22T02:37:34Z

Replaced content with "For no reason, my forum account was banned right after it was created. After it was sorted out, my account on that forum is https://community.endmyopia.org/u/a-user"

Show changes

User at 19:43, 6 September 2021

2021-09-06T19:43:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:43, 6 September 2021
Line 130:		Line 130:

	I still have the transient astigmatism at 57 and 67 cm, but it's not that noticeable, so I guess the solution is to work around 58 cm to avoid blur adaptation. This means I can continue to keep getting 99% of my improvements from close-up for now.		I still have the transient astigmatism at 57 and 67 cm, but it's not that noticeable, so I guess the solution is to work around 58 cm to avoid blur adaptation. This means I can continue to keep getting 99% of my improvements from close-up for now.

			later updates moved to https://community.endmyopia.org/t/0-35-d-week-0-05-d-day-fixed-blur-adaptation-in-a-few-days-2-5-2-to-1-75-in-15-days/15727/4

User: /* Still Learning */

2021-09-06T17:36:03Z

Still Learning

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:36, 6 September 2021
Line 128:		Line 128:

	I already feel a bit better going back to these correction levels, but still a bit strange. Maybe I actually have to go outside more in the future, since I won't be able to keep getting 99% of my improvements from close-up.		I already feel a bit better going back to these correction levels, but still a bit strange. Maybe I actually have to go outside more in the future, since I won't be able to keep getting 99% of my improvements from close-up.

			I still have the transient astigmatism at 57 and 67 cm, but it's not that noticeable, so I guess the solution is to work around 58 cm to avoid blur adaptation. This means I can continue to keep getting 99% of my improvements from close-up for now.

User: /* Still Learning */

2021-09-06T17:31:58Z

Still Learning

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 6 September 2021
Line 127:		Line 127:
	differential: 0		differential: 0

	I already feel a bit better going back to these correction levels. Maybe I actually have to go outside more in the future, since I won't be able to keep getting 99% of my improvements from close-up.		I already feel a bit better going back to these correction levels, but still a bit strange. Maybe I actually have to go outside more in the future, since I won't be able to keep getting 99% of my improvements from close-up.

User: /* Still Learning */

2021-09-06T17:31:18Z

Still Learning

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 6 September 2021
Line 119:		Line 119:

	=== Still Learning ===		=== Still Learning ===
	I guess I still didn't understand the material that well. I was way overcorrected in the last few days, just because I thought not having total clarity would be blur adaption. Since I'm equalized and have no more blur adaptation, I guess the fix is to use appropriate correction levels:		I guess I still didn't understand the material that well. I was way overcorrected in the last few days, just because I thought not having total clarity (which corresponds to better than 20/20) would be blur adaption. While it fixed my blur adaptation, it messed up other things. Since I'm now equalized and have no more blur adaptation, I guess the fix is to use appropriate correction levels:

	normalized: -1 or 0 (20/20 left eye, 20/15 right eye on ~~snellen~~)		normalized: -1 or 0 (20/20 left eye, 20/15 right eye on bright Snellen)

	tv glasses: -0.5 (for viewing at 2m)		tv glasses: -0.5 (for viewing at 2m)

	differential: 0		differential: 0

			I already feel a bit better going back to these correction levels. Maybe I actually have to go outside more in the future, since I won't be able to keep getting 99% of my improvements from close-up.

User: /* Still Learning */

2021-09-06T17:16:44Z

Still Learning

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 6 September 2021
Line 122:		Line 122:

	normalized: -1 or 0 (20/20 left eye, 20/15 right eye on snellen)		normalized: -1 or 0 (20/20 left eye, 20/15 right eye on snellen)

	tv glasses: -0.5 (for viewing at 2m)		tv glasses: -0.5 (for viewing at 2m)

	differential: 0		differential: 0

User: /* Day 17: Regret */

2021-09-06T17:16:35Z

Day 17: Regret

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 6 September 2021
Line 117:		Line 117:

	It's interesting how our visual system can compensate for cylinder and spherical distortion.		It's interesting how our visual system can compensate for cylinder and spherical distortion.

			=== Still Learning ===
			I guess I still didn't understand the material that well. I was way overcorrected in the last few days, just because I thought not having total clarity would be blur adaption. Since I'm equalized and have no more blur adaptation, I guess the fix is to use appropriate correction levels:

			normalized: -1 or 0 (20/20 left eye, 20/15 right eye on snellen)
			tv glasses: -0.5 (for viewing at 2m)
			differential: 0

User: /* Insights about Transient Astigmatism and Cylinders */

2021-09-06T15:48:56Z

Insights about Transient Astigmatism and Cylinders

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:48, 6 September 2021
Line 114:		Line 114:
	If you stop using glasses, your eye's axial length adjusts, but the visual system doesn't care. It'll still think your vision is distorted in the same way as before and has a dependency on the lenses you used, while accommodating as needed to make it focused.		If you stop using glasses, your eye's axial length adjusts, but the visual system doesn't care. It'll still think your vision is distorted in the same way as before and has a dependency on the lenses you used, while accommodating as needed to make it focused.

	Whenever a cylinder is changed, the eye compensates for it, affecting all later focal planes. Equalizing seems to just "repair" one eye while leaving the other one alone. Simple binocular spherical changes (and object distance) just "navigate" the focal planes. When undoing the changes, ~~after~~ you ~~hit~~ the cylinder change point, it removes the change point and applies the cylinder to the entire focal plane, and then you should fix it before continuing to reduce, although it's not strictly necessary. At the change point, everything before the change point was still distorted differently. The visual system just stops applying cylinder ~~correction to~~ the ~~entire~~ focal ~~plane, making it seem like the cylinder was applied to the near planes and the opposite cylinder was applied to the far~~ planes.		Whenever a cylinder is changed, the eye compensates for it, affecting all later focal planes. Equalizing seems to just "repair" one eye while leaving the other one alone. Simple binocular spherical changes (and object distance) just "navigate" the focal planes. When undoing the changes, you can slowly undo the cylinder change point, which creates unresolved cylinder distortion in the nearer focal planes.

	It's interesting how our visual system can compensate for cylinder and spherical distortion.		It's interesting how our visual system can compensate for cylinder and spherical distortion.

User: /* Insights about Transient Astigmatism and Cylinders */

2021-09-06T15:38:11Z

Insights about Transient Astigmatism and Cylinders

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:38, 6 September 2021
Line 114:		Line 114:
	If you stop using glasses, your eye's axial length adjusts, but the visual system doesn't care. It'll still think your vision is distorted in the same way as before and has a dependency on the lenses you used, while accommodating as needed to make it focused.		If you stop using glasses, your eye's axial length adjusts, but the visual system doesn't care. It'll still think your vision is distorted in the same way as before and has a dependency on the lenses you used, while accommodating as needed to make it focused.

	Whenever a cylinder is changed, the eye compensates for it, affecting all later focal planes. Equalizing seems to ~~change the offset for~~ one eye ~~when "navigating"~~ the ~~focal planes~~. Simple binocular spherical changes ~~affect the offset for both eyes when navigating~~ the focal planes. When undoing the changes, after you hit the cylinder change point, it removes the change point and applies the cylinder to the entire focal plane, and then you should fix it before continuing to reduce, although it's not strictly necessary. At the change point, everything before the change point was still distorted differently. The visual system just stops applying cylinder correction to the entire focal plane, making it seem like the cylinder was applied to the near planes and the opposite cylinder was applied to the far planes.		Whenever a cylinder is changed, the eye compensates for it, affecting all later focal planes. Equalizing seems to just "repair" one eye while leaving the other one alone. Simple binocular spherical changes (and object distance) just "navigate" the focal planes. When undoing the changes, after you hit the cylinder change point, it removes the change point and applies the cylinder to the entire focal plane, and then you should fix it before continuing to reduce, although it's not strictly necessary. At the change point, everything before the change point was still distorted differently. The visual system just stops applying cylinder correction to the entire focal plane, making it seem like the cylinder was applied to the near planes and the opposite cylinder was applied to the far planes.

	It's interesting how our visual system can compensate for cylinder and spherical distortion.		It's interesting how our visual system can compensate for cylinder and spherical distortion.

User: /* Insights about Transient Astigmatism and Cylinders */

2021-09-06T15:32:20Z

Insights about Transient Astigmatism and Cylinders

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:32, 6 September 2021
Line 114:		Line 114:
	If you stop using glasses, your eye's axial length adjusts, but the visual system doesn't care. It'll still think your vision is distorted in the same way as before and has a dependency on the lenses you used, while accommodating as needed to make it focused.		If you stop using glasses, your eye's axial length adjusts, but the visual system doesn't care. It'll still think your vision is distorted in the same way as before and has a dependency on the lenses you used, while accommodating as needed to make it focused.

	Whenever a cylinder is changed, the eye compensates for it, affecting all later focal planes. Equalizing seems to change the offset for one eye when "navigating" the focal planes. Simple binocular spherical changes affect the offset for both eyes when navigating the focal planes. When undoing the changes, after you hit the cylinder change point, it applies the cylinder to the entire focal plane, and then you ~~have to~~ fix it ~~using the nearer focal plane~~ before continuing to reduce. At the change point, everything before the change point was still distorted differently. The visual system just stops applying cylinder correction to the entire focal plane, making it seem like the cylinder was applied to the near planes and the opposite cylinder was applied to the far planes.		Whenever a cylinder is changed, the eye compensates for it, affecting all later focal planes. Equalizing seems to change the offset for one eye when "navigating" the focal planes. Simple binocular spherical changes affect the offset for both eyes when navigating the focal planes. When undoing the changes, after you hit the cylinder change point, it removes the change point and applies the cylinder to the entire focal plane, and then you should fix it before continuing to reduce, although it's not strictly necessary. At the change point, everything before the change point was still distorted differently. The visual system just stops applying cylinder correction to the entire focal plane, making it seem like the cylinder was applied to the near planes and the opposite cylinder was applied to the far planes.

	It's interesting how our visual system can compensate for cylinder and spherical distortion.		It's interesting how our visual system can compensate for cylinder and spherical distortion.