Difference between revisions of Endmyopia:Consensus

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{EM policy}}{{Nutshell|Consensus is how things change on the wiki. Everything is changeable, pending an agreement of editors.|People should [[EM:be bold|be bold]] and make the change they want to see - if it gets reverted or editors dispute the change then a discussion can follow.}}
{{EM policy}}{{Nutshell|Consensus is how things change on the wiki. Everything is changeable, pending an agreement of editors.|People should [[EM:be bold|be bold]] and make the change they want to see - if it gets reverted or editors dispute the change then a discussion can follow.|Don't start edit wars, always discuss changes to be made if editors disagree.}}
 
For the most part, you should [[EM:be bold|be bold]] and just change what you like. Sometimes there are disagreements between editors - in this case you should open up the issue for discussion on the talk page, notifying any editors who may be interested with <nowiki>{{re|user}}</nowiki> to get people's opinions.
 
==No edit wars==
{{shortcut|EM:NOEDITWARS|EM:NOWAR}}
[[File:Guy firing guns like crazy.gif|right]]
Edit warring, where editors repeatedly restore their own revision to the page instead of discussing edits is really strongly discouraged. It's not productive, and is clearly [[EM:NOTHERE]] behaviour.
 
You can revert an edit by another editor about once. If there are still problems, just discuss it. [[EM:Assume good faith|Assume good faith]]! Most people are reasonable and just want to write the best article they can {{smiley}}
===Vandalism===
Unless it's [[EM:vandalism|vandalism]]. Then you're welcome to edit war all you want, until an administrator blocks the user.
{{clear}}


==Exceptions==
==Exceptions==
* Where there are legal concerns
* Where there are legal concerns
* Whatever [[User:NottNott|NottNott]] put on [[User:NottNott/Things I'm ignoring consensus on|NottNott/Things I'm ignoring consensus on]]
* Whatever [[User:NottNott|NottNott]] put on [[User:NottNott/Essays/Things I'm ignoring consensus on|Things I'm ignoring consensus on]]


{{Policies and guidelines}}
{{Editing navbox}}

Revision as of 11:57, 13 June 2020

For the most part, you should be bold and just change what you like. Sometimes there are disagreements between editors - in this case you should open up the issue for discussion on the talk page, notifying any editors who may be interested with {{re|user}} to get people's opinions.

No edit wars

Page Template:Shortcut/styles.css has no content.

Guy firing guns like crazy.gif

Edit warring, where editors repeatedly restore their own revision to the page instead of discussing edits is really strongly discouraged. It's not productive, and is clearly EM:NOTHERE behaviour.

You can revert an edit by another editor about once. If there are still problems, just discuss it. Assume good faith! Most people are reasonable and just want to write the best article they can Face-smile.svg

Vandalism

Unless it's vandalism. Then you're welcome to edit war all you want, until an administrator blocks the user.

Exceptions