Difference between revisions of Talk:20/x vision
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dlskidmore (talk | contribs) m (rewrite?) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Rewrite? == | == Rewrite? == | ||
The link between maximum corrected visual acuity and refraction is weak. I think this should be re-written to be more factual, or provide references for your point of view. [[User:Dlskidmore|Dlskidmore]] ([[User talk:Dlskidmore|talk]]) 21:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC) | The link between maximum corrected visual acuity and refraction is weak. I think this should be re-written to be more factual, or provide references for your point of view. [[User:Dlskidmore|Dlskidmore]] ([[User talk:Dlskidmore|talk]]) 21:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC) | ||
:{{re|Dlskidmore}} I agree. Though I think I'd be more inclined to just make it a link to the acuity page and expand upon it in there. [[User:Divenal|Divenal]] ([[User talk:Divenal|talk]]) 18:53, 19 July 2020 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:53, 19 July 2020
Merge?
Merge with the Visual acuity page? Dlskidmore (talk) 21:44, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Rewrite?
The link between maximum corrected visual acuity and refraction is weak. I think this should be re-written to be more factual, or provide references for your point of view. Dlskidmore (talk) 21:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Dlskidmore: I agree. Though I think I'd be more inclined to just make it a link to the acuity page and expand upon it in there. Divenal (talk) 18:53, 19 July 2020 (UTC)