| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
I find that AF is the one-and-only true eye exercise. Combining the habit-fixing and gradual lens reduction of EndMyopia, the control system model from Otis Brown (his posts are in a really weird style though), and the concept of eye exercises (but using one that actually works, instead of other ones that don't) seems to result in really fast gains compared to knowing only one alone (EM doesn't advocate for exercise until you are a pro, control system model doesn't account for polyopia resolution, and eye exercises that are not AF don't affect refraction). Perhaps the axial length would take time to resolve if I didn't solve it while I was "blur-adapted". | I find that AF is the one-and-only true eye exercise. Combining the habit-fixing and gradual lens reduction of EndMyopia, the control system model from Otis Brown (his posts are in a really weird style though), and the concept of eye exercises (but using one that actually works, instead of other ones that don't) seems to result in really fast gains compared to knowing only one alone (EM doesn't advocate for exercise until you are a pro, control system model doesn't account for polyopia resolution, and eye exercises that are not AF don't affect refraction). Perhaps the axial length would take time to resolve if I didn't solve it while I was "blur-adapted". | ||
I now actually think there are three different centimeter measurements you can make: | |||
# edge of blur, based on axial length | |||
# edge of clarity, based on ability to resolve double vision, near or equal to previous | |||
# edge of ability, based on ability to completely clear double vision, near or equal to previous | |||
The idea to fix blur adaptation is to have lens that let you push from edge of clarity to edge of ability. | |||