Varilux

Revision as of 07:57, 22 August 2026 by Imperial-beard (talk | contribs) (Create Varilux entry: history, Minkwitz optics, documented fall risk, sources)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Varilux

Varilux is Essilor's progressive addition lens brand and the first commercially successful progressive lens. It was invented by Bernard Maitenaz, patented in 1953 and launched in May 1959. Over 700 million Varilux lenses have been sold since.

The 1959 trial

Before release, Varilux was tested on 46 people in January 1959. The recorded outcomes were 5 excellent, 29 good, 2 average and 10 poor. The lens launched four months later. Roughly 22% of the founding trial did badly, so non-adaptation was documented from the start rather than discovered later by wearers.

Why the peripheral blur cannot be removed

The distortion at the sides of any progressive lens is a geometric consequence, not a manufacturing defect. Minkwitz's theorem (see Sheedy & Campbell, Optometry and Vision Science, 2005) states that along the umbilical corridor of a progressive surface, unwanted astigmatism perpendicular to the corridor increases roughly twice as fast as the mean power increases along it.

Two consequences follow:

  • A stronger reading add, or a shorter corridor, produces proportionally worse peripheral blur.
  • The distortion can be redistributed across the lens surface but cannot be reduced.

This applies to every progressive lens from every manufacturer. Premium designs relocate the distortion according to assumptions about gaze behaviour; they do not remove it.

Current product lines

The current flagship is the XR series, marketed as "eye-responsive" and using three named technologies: Nanoptix, Xtend and XR-motion. XR Comfort Max claims an extended near zone. Older X series and Physio lines remain on sale. Street prices range from about $139 a pair online to $700-$900 or more for XR with coatings through a retail optician.

Documented risks

  • Progressive lens wearers fall at roughly twice the rate of bifocal wearers: adjusted odds
 ratio 2.23 (Lord et al., Optometry and Vision Science, 2025, n=281). Falls per person
 2.31 against 1.61.
  • Multifocal wearers fall about 2.3 times as often as non-wearers (Lord, Dayhew & Howland,
 Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2002, n=156).
  • Toe clearance becomes more variable in multifocals, though the mean is unchanged
 (Johnson, Buckley, Scally & Elliott, IOVS, 2007).
  • A randomised controlled trial found that giving single vision distance glasses to multifocal
 wearers reduced falls in those with regular outdoor activity, while noting the switch
 may be harmful for low-activity wearers (Haran et al., BMJ, 2010, n=606).
  • Peripheral distortion measurably corrupts optic flow, producing a false sense of upward
 self-motion on level ground (Sauer et al., iScience, 2021).
  • Progressive wearers develop a distinct eye-head coordination pattern, holding the eyes near
 centre and turning the head instead (Rifai & Wahl, Journal of Vision, 2016).

The reading segment at the bottom of the lens is focused at roughly 40 cm. Floor distance is around 150 cm, so the part of the lens used to see the ground is out of focus for the ground.

The endmyopia position

Two pairs of single vision lenses, one for distance and a deliberately weak pair for close work, remove the corridor, the peripheral distortion and the out-of-focus lower field entirely. See Differential Glasses and Presbyopia.

External links