Difference between revisions of Talk:Refraction
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dlskidmore (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Should this be written as a disambiguation page? With those two headers broken out into their own pages? ~~~~") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should this be written as a disambiguation page? With those two headers broken out into their own pages? [[User:Dlskidmore|Dlskidmore]] ([[User talk:Dlskidmore|talk]]) 02:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC) | Should this be written as a disambiguation page? With those two headers broken out into their own pages? [[User:Dlskidmore|Dlskidmore]] ([[User talk:Dlskidmore|talk]]) 02:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
:{{re|Dlskidmore}}Possibly, though I had never heard of it in the refractrometry sense. I think most (all ?) internal references would be to the light-bending sense, so disambiguation presumaly means each reference has to be updated to go to the specific one. Would we end with any (direct) references to the other one ? [[User:Divenal|Divenal]] ([[User talk:Divenal|talk]]) 08:07, 11 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:07, 11 June 2020
Should this be written as a disambiguation page? With those two headers broken out into their own pages? Dlskidmore (talk) 02:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Dlskidmore:Possibly, though I had never heard of it in the refractrometry sense. I think most (all ?) internal references would be to the light-bending sense, so disambiguation presumaly means each reference has to be updated to go to the specific one. Would we end with any (direct) references to the other one ? Divenal (talk) 08:07, 11 June 2020 (UTC)