Difference between revisions of Talk:Vision training
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Slight concern about "does not promote"... it has negative implications (that we are against it), whereas (AFAIK) we are entirely neutral about it since convergence issues are outside the scope (?) I think even "the only vision training EM promotes is active focus" has some negative connotations. "Other than promoting active focus, EM is neutral on vision therapy" ? [[User:Divenal|Divenal]] ([[User talk:Divenal|talk]]) 09:05, 1 June 2020 (UTC) | Slight concern about "does not promote"... it has negative implications (that we are against it), whereas (AFAIK) we are entirely neutral about it since convergence issues are outside the scope (?) I think even "the only vision training EM promotes is active focus" has some negative connotations. "Other than promoting active focus, EM is neutral on vision therapy" ? Oh, hang on... I guess Bates would also qualify as "exercises to improve vision", and therefore vision training, and I guess we are against that. [[User:Divenal|Divenal]] ([[User talk:Divenal|talk]]) 09:05, 1 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:11, 1 June 2020
Slight concern about "does not promote"... it has negative implications (that we are against it), whereas (AFAIK) we are entirely neutral about it since convergence issues are outside the scope (?) I think even "the only vision training EM promotes is active focus" has some negative connotations. "Other than promoting active focus, EM is neutral on vision therapy" ? Oh, hang on... I guess Bates would also qualify as "exercises to improve vision", and therefore vision training, and I guess we are against that. Divenal (talk) 09:05, 1 June 2020 (UTC)