Difference between revisions of Review talk:Buying glasses and lenses
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(r) |
(→As deletion candidate: ~~~~) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:{{re|Sam.Watson}} Redlinks and stub articles IMO should be embraced, instead of not having an eventual page in the first place. Just my opinion though and welcome to get thoughts {{smiley}} -[[User:NottNott|<span style="color:#e67e22">NottNott</span>]] <small>([[User talk:NottNott|talk]])</small> 16:23, 23 June 2020 (UTC) | :{{re|Sam.Watson}} Redlinks and stub articles IMO should be embraced, instead of not having an eventual page in the first place. Just my opinion though and welcome to get thoughts {{smiley}} -[[User:NottNott|<span style="color:#e67e22">NottNott</span>]] <small>([[User talk:NottNott|talk]])</small> 16:23, 23 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
: I found the Lense seller page which it should merge with. ~NottNott corrected the spelling, and I turned it into a category page so that it would be easy to add future reviews to this category. [[User:Dlskidmore|Dlskidmore]] ([[User talk:Dlskidmore|talk]]) 16:40, 23 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
: I'm terrible at the syntax here. I've got a dozen of these markup languages down, I keep getting them cross wired if I don't use them all the time. [[User:Dlskidmore|Dlskidmore]] ([[User talk:Dlskidmore|talk]]) 16:43, 23 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
: {{re|Dlskidmore}} {{re|NottNott}} - there's currently a broken link 'reviews' on the front page (bottom of 2nd column). Is there a plan for that ..? [[User:Divenal|Divenal]] ([[User talk:Divenal|talk]]) 19:25, 23 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
: {{re|Divenal}} looks like it's been fixed, now says Reviews and references Category:Lens seller through a redirect. | |||
Hiiii shouldn't this page have a redirect to whatever it got merged with? | |||
[[User:Angel|Angel]] ([[User talk:Angel|talk]]) 01:13, 18 October 2021 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 01:13, 18 October 2021
As deletion candidate
Why marked for potential delete or merge? I'll do the merge if I can find the other page. It does need a lot more entries to be a full article. Dlskidmore (talk) 16:20, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Dlskidmore: Have removed the articles for deletion category for now. No big deal.
- @Sam.Watson: Redlinks and stub articles IMO should be embraced, instead of not having an eventual page in the first place. Just my opinion though and welcome to get thoughts -NottNott (talk) 16:23, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- I found the Lense seller page which it should merge with. ~NottNott corrected the spelling, and I turned it into a category page so that it would be easy to add future reviews to this category. Dlskidmore (talk) 16:40, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- I'm terrible at the syntax here. I've got a dozen of these markup languages down, I keep getting them cross wired if I don't use them all the time. Dlskidmore (talk) 16:43, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Dlskidmore: @NottNott: - there's currently a broken link 'reviews' on the front page (bottom of 2nd column). Is there a plan for that ..? Divenal (talk) 19:25, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Divenal: looks like it's been fixed, now says Reviews and references Category:Lens seller through a redirect.
Hiiii shouldn't this page have a redirect to whatever it got merged with?