Difference between revisions of Talk:Axis
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
How do you reference the same reference twice without a new number for each? [[User:Dlskidmore|Dlskidmore]] ([[User talk:Dlskidmore|talk]]) 18:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC) | How do you reference the same reference twice without a new number for each? [[User:Dlskidmore|Dlskidmore]] ([[User talk:Dlskidmore|talk]]) 18:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
:{{re|Dlskidmore}} I had the same question - see my talk page. You use <nowiki><ref name=xxx>...</ref></nowiki> , and then to refer back to it, you have another ref section with the same named tag, and and empty body. [[User:Divenal|Divenal]] ([[User talk:Divenal|talk]]) 11:30, 26 June 2020 (UTC) | :{{re|Dlskidmore}} I had the same question - see my talk page. You use <nowiki><ref name=xxx>...</ref></nowiki> , and then to refer back to it, you have another ref section with the same named tag, and and empty body. [[User:Divenal|Divenal]] ([[User talk:Divenal|talk]]) 11:30, 26 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
==symmetry== | |||
{{re|Dlskidmore}} your ref says that there is no symmetry between left/right. But the 2007 review {{cite journal| author=Read SA, Collins MJ, Carney LG| title=A review of astigmatism and its possible genesis. | journal=Clin Exp Optom | year= 2007 | volume= 90 | issue= 1 | pages= 5-19 | pmid=17177660 | doi=10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00112.x | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=17177660 }} seems to think there is | |||
ASTIGMATISM IN RIGHT AND LEFT EYES | |||
There is widespread agreement that some degree of symmetry exists between the refractive errors of right and left eyes... | |||
Revision as of 13:08, 26 June 2020
References
How do you reference the same reference twice without a new number for each? Dlskidmore (talk) 18:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Dlskidmore: I had the same question - see my talk page. You use <ref name=xxx>...</ref> , and then to refer back to it, you have another ref section with the same named tag, and and empty body. Divenal (talk) 11:30, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
symmetry
@Dlskidmore: your ref says that there is no symmetry between left/right. But the 2007 review Read SA, Collins MJ, Carney LG (2007). "A review of astigmatism and its possible genesis". Clin Exp Optom. 90 (1): 5–19. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00112.x. PMID 17177660.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content. seems to think there is
ASTIGMATISM IN RIGHT AND LEFT EYES There is widespread agreement that some degree of symmetry exists between the refractive errors of right and left eyes...